(In-)Equality of Opportunity, Fairness, and Distributional Preferences
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Social Preferences under Uncertainty∗ Equality of Opportunity vs. Equality of Outcome
This paper introduces a model of inequality aversion that captures a preference for equality of ex-ante expected payoff relative to a preference for equality of ex-post payoff by a single parameter. On deterministic allocations, the model reduces to the model of Fehr and Schmidt (1999). The model provides a unified explanation for recent experiments on probabilistic dictator games and dictator ...
متن کاملSocial Preferences under Risk: Equality of Opportunity versus Equality of Outcome
X and Y are brothers who like to share everything, whenever possible. They are also both huge fans of football. One day, X finds an envelope in the park that contains just one ticket to the next Super Bowl. X agonizes over whether to (i) attend the game secretly, which would make him feel guilty; or (ii) tell his brother about it and suggest they flip a coin to decide who gets to go. From an ex...
متن کاملEquality of Opportunity versus Equality of Opportunity Sets
We characterize two different approaches to the idea of equality of opportunity. Roemer’s social ordering is motivated by a concern to compensate for the effects of certain (non-responsibility) factors on outcomes. Van de gaer’s social ordering is concerned with the equalization of the opportunity sets to which people have access. We show how different invariance axioms open the possibility to ...
متن کاملEQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY By
" Equality of opportunity * " 1 2 by 3 John E. Roemer 4 and 5 Alain Trannoy 6 7 1. Introduction 8 In the welfarist tradition of social-choice theory, egalitarianism means equality of 9 welfare or utility 1. Conservative critics of egalitarianism rightly protest that it is highly 10 questionable that this kind of equality is ethically desirable, as it fails to hold persons 11 responsible for the...
متن کاملEquality of Opportunity
" Equality of opportunity * " 1 2 by 3 John E. Roemer 4 and 5 Alain Trannoy 6 7 1. Introduction 8 In the welfarist tradition of social-choice theory, egalitarianism means equality of 9 welfare or utility 1. Conservative critics of egalitarianism rightly protest that it is highly 10 questionable that this kind of equality is ethically desirable, as it fails to hold persons 11 responsible for the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Social Science Research Network
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1556-5068']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4257200